Gbadegesin, J T; Ojekalu, S; Komolafe, M O and Oyewole, M O (2022) Underlying factors for effective collective decision on community-driven infrastructure in developing countries. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(11), pp. 2121-2133. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The prevailing collective decision in the emerging communities in Sub-Sahara Africa illustrates the paradigm shift from top-down decision making to bottom-up democratic practices in procuring community-based infrastructure, in the era of dwindling financial capacity of government. This paper analyses factors influencing the success of the community-driven project in selected communities surrounding the largest city of Ibadan. We collected survey data through copies of semi-structured questionnaire, backed with an interview. Factor analysis categorizes the major factors into seven groups, including social integration and commitment to the community development project, governance structure and leadership, democracy, selfless services, networking and accountability, openness in selecting professionals for development, and joint agreement. We subject the items of the factors into SWOT analysis to understand the values. Community-based organizations (CBOs) serve as potential means to address infrastructure deficit if CBOs take note of the main factors, use the opportunities that match the strengths, attempt to overcome the weaknesses to attain the opportunities, use the strength to reduce the vulnerability to the threats and prevent the weaknesses to avoid susceptibility to the threats.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | challenges; collective action; community-driven project; factors; Ibadan; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | vulnerability, questionnaire, integration, decision-making, collective action, survey, accountability, commitment, networking, community development, community-based, developing country, interview, factor analysis, paradigm, Nigeria, Africa, governance |
| Subjects: | communities and social development, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, liability law, organizational analysis, decision analysis, Geography, development economics, education and knowledge transfer, regions and continents, communication, psychology, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Governance, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here