Hajarolasvadi, H and Shahhosseini, V (2022) Assignment of engineers to constructions project teams based on person-team fit. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), pp. 2895-2904. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry is project-oriented. The dynamic nature of the construction projects makes team deployment inevitable for responding to changing project needs. Thus, proper team selection is vital to achieving project objectives. Although many previous studies have remarked the importance of the provision of team chemistry, when it comes to practicality, the main emphasis has always been on the individuals' competencies. Therefore, this gap is addressed by developing a two-step model based on the concept and principles of Person-Team fit, which considers two aspects for effective team selection; supplementary person team fit (SF) and complementary person team fit (CF). While CF can be achieved through the measurement of individuals' competencies, SF is a function of team members' preferences in working with their teammates. The model was applied in the selection of small teams in an industrial project. The results revealed that the proposed framework is capable to provide fitness between person and team. The aim of this research is to provide project managers with a new tool for team selection which simultaneously considers quality collaboration among team members and complementary support in individual competencies. Also, the findings suggest employee participation as a key step toward effective team selection.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | person-team fit; sociometry; team selection |
| Index terms: | engineer, project manager, project team, construction industry, preference, construction project, collaboration, employee participation |
| Subjects: | project delivery, psychology, profession, industry analysis, production management, management, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here