Sharing tacit knowledge in small-medium regional construction companies in the U.S.: The current status and the impact of organizational ecology

Hwang, S (2022) Sharing tacit knowledge in small-medium regional construction companies in the U.S.: The current status and the impact of organizational ecology. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1746-1755. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to investigate the status of tacit knowledge sharing practice and the impact of organizational ecology on the practice in small-medium regional construction companies in the U.S. This study particularly focuses on the impact of six constructs of organizational ecology identified through a synthesis of previous works. The constructs are employee’s awareness and perception of tacit knowledge sharing, functional areas benefited from tacit knowledge sharing, company-wide efforts for promoting tacit knowledge sharing, organizational culture, networking and the communities of practice, and the choice of a means and ICT implementation. To accomplish the objective, this study surveyed practitioners using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro-Wilk test, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test, and t-test to compare three cohorts of respondents. All respondents consider tacit knowledge an important asset and are willing to share their knowledge. To improve the current practice, companies should establish formal procedures, provide more training opportunities, allow time for participation in sharing and the codification of knowledge, and invest in enhancing internal communication and collaboration for knowledge sharing. The findings of this study are expected to assist practitioners effectively in creating an organizational ecology for advanced tacit knowledge sharing in the workplace.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building and construction; knowledge sharing; organizational ecology; regional construction companies; tacit knowledge
Index terms: networking, knowledge sharing, construction company, tacit knowledge, internal communication, organizational culture, collaboration, questionnaire, practitioner, ecology, statistical analysis, communities of practice, implementation
Subjects: organization, data collection methods, practitioner, communication, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, environmental science, data science, management, professional development, sociology
Topics: Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here