Framework for implementing integrated service-learning

Hwang, S (2022) Framework for implementing integrated service-learning. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(7), pp. 1260-1273. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This paper presents a pedagogical framework for implementing integrated service-learning. Its purpose is to provide a guide for the process integration of design and construction in a single service project and the vertical class integration of lower- and upper-class students into a collaborative project team. It comprises four phases and each phase consists of multiple tasks to be performed to develop and execute a project. The framework was created by synthesizing experiences and lessons gleaned from four service-learning projects conducted earlier and further revised through its application and evaluation. This paper features three service-learning projects conducted by applying the framework to demonstrate its application and evaluate its effectiveness. Three evaluation methods—a survey questionnaire, short essays, and post-project reflection—were used to evaluate the effectiveness. The results of the evaluations show that the framework is useful to develop and execute integrated service-learning projects and thereby helps students accomplish the targeted learning outcomes. More specifically, it can be effectively used to increase student learning in critical thinking, design development, construction techniques, management skills, teamwork, and leadership. The detailed documentation of the three projects presented herein is expected to serve educators who wish to apply the learning approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: pedagogical framework; process integration; service-learning; vertical class integration
Index terms: documentation, survey, integration, questionnaire, service project, teamwork, reflection, effectiveness, design and construction, collaborative project, design development, learning outcome, critical thinking
Subjects: contractual arrangements, data collection methods, specialized education, organizational analysis, student development, performance management, management, professional development, design process, production management
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Design Practice, Education, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here