Kavishe, N and Chileshe, N (2022) Development and validation of public-private partnerships framework for delivering housing projects in developing countries: A case of Tanzania. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), pp. 873-890. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The supply of adequate houses is still a big challenge in many developing countries, particularly in Africa, where the population and urbanization rate is continuously growing. Increasingly Governments in many developing countries have adopted public–private partnerships (PPPs) to meet their housing needs. However despite the adoption, problems still remain and the progress is slow. Various studies have examined the ranges of issues that have produced the poor results in delivering PPP projects in developing countries. However; no tool (framework) has been developed to address these challenges for a successful outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study was to present a validated PPP framework which will address the identified challenges in order to improve housing delivery. The proposed housing PPP framework was empirically validated by 12 PPP experts who were purposely selected in order to ascertain its applicability, effectiveness and adaptability. The results of the validation showed that the proposed measures within the housing PPP (HPPP) framework all rated above the test value, thus demonstrating its viability. The implication of the findings is the applicability of the HPPP framework in assisting the stakeholders address the existing challenges. Second, the framework has the potential of providing valuable guidance and roadmaps for successful delivery of PPP housing projects in developing countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; housing projects; public–private partnerships; Tanzania; validated framework |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, partnership, Africa, Tanzania, urbanization, housing, adaptability, housing need, validation, population, housing project, housing delivery, developing country |
| Subjects: | partnership management, housing and residential development, demography, performance management, development economics, professional development, Geography, urban planning, regions and continents, user focus, construction type |
| Topics: | Information Management, Geographical Context, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here