Kesuma, P A; Rohman, M A and Arif Prastyanto, C (2022) Analysing the root cause of the damage risk in heavy vehicles to reduce traffic congestion. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(10), pp. 1872-1883. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study aims to investigate important damage risks in heavy vehicles on the highway using risk analysis method as well as to examine their root causes using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). This is important as the basis for formulating the solution to solve the Non-Recurrent traffic Congestion (NRC) problems which often happens in Surabaya's arterial roads. Data was collected through series of research steps consisting preliminary survey, questionnaire survey as well as expert's interview survey. Five top risk events were obtained from risk analysis using Probability-Impact Matrix, namely flat tire, engine failure, damage on the axle, damage on the leaf spring, and accident. Meanwhile, 25 basic events were obtained as the root cause the five high risks based on FTA method. Eight highest basic events are overloading, poor maintenance, inadequate periodic vehicle inspection, potholes on road, poor road surface, inadequate or improper pre-operational check, driver behavior, and the road up or down steeply. This paper contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing a framework to investigate NRC problem due to damage risks in the heavy vehicle by combining risk analysis and FTA methods to obtain a comprehensive understanding about this problem and to create a more sustainable road transportation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fault tree analysis; heavy vehicle; non-recurrent traffic congestion; risk management; root cause |
| Index terms: | risk management, inspection, traffic congestion, body of knowledge, risk analysis, fault-tree analysis, questionnaire, survey, interview |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, risk management, risk assessment, data collection methods, environmental hazards, transportation engineering, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here