Lu, Y; Sood, T; Chang, R and Liao, L (2022) Factors impacting integrated design process of net zero energy buildings: An integrated framework. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1700-1712. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Adoption of an Integrated Design Process (IDP) to achieve Net Zero Energy Building (NZEB) targets is suggested by various studies, but there is a serious lack of pragmatic understanding of factors and relationships that affect its implementation in real-life projects. The focus of this study is to identify tangible (such as budget) and intangible (such as conflict of interest, expertise and experience, sense of ownership and occupant input) factors and relationships to help practitioners and researchers gain a better operational understanding of IDP implementation in actual projects. The study first identifies and organises factors and relationships into a systematic framework and then demonstrates the applicability of the framework using a case study. In the study, identification of previously studied factors and relationships is taken up through directed content analysis of literature, followed by semi-structured interviews with ten building experts to expand on existing knowledge providing new factors and relationships. Using Dedoose, factor frequency and co-occurrence analysis of audio and textual interview transcripts are conducted to obtain a total of forty-one unique factors and relationships. Lastly, framework validation is achieved using an actual IDP implementation case study - the new NZEB at the National University of Singapore (NUS). The framework is useful to design teams for training on IDP and design management, and to researchers for comparison of IDP implementation between projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design management; framework; net zero energy building; Singapore; sustainability |
| Index terms: | implementation, ownership, integrated design process, case study, design team, validation, Singapore, net-zero energy building, interview, content analysis, practitioner, design management |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, professional development, design process, professional practice, sustainable design, Geography, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, data collection methods, economics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Procurement, Design Practice, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Sustainability, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here