Magdy, M; Abdel-Monem, M and El Dash, K (2022) Float loss impact on project cost. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1647-1656. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This research contributes to a realistic schedule development that will benefit construction industry professionals to better analyse float loss impact on project cost. The research paper draws attention to the importance of float and how affects project cost, beside that the paper tries to solve the dilemma of float ownership by determining the cost impact of float loss due to project parties' delays. The paper proposes a new approach that classifies the cost impact of float loss into four cases including: interruption of resource usage which will be analysed considering the forgetting and learning theories; effect of Cash flow change; impact of the price change for construction materials during float consumption; finally, float loss impact on crews' cost (Labour and equipment), while activities' duration increase. After that the paper provides a case study to discuss the developed framework and developed simple application tool to calculate the total cost. The results indicated that the float loss has a tangible effect on the total project cost. For the dilemma of float ownership, the float should be available for all project parties with responsibility for float consumption cost damages.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow; float loss; resource usage |
| Index terms: | consumption, learning theory, project cost, damages, project party, cash flow, research paper, construction industry, duration, construction material, ownership, case study |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, project controls, sociology, financial management, economics, building materials, consumer economics, dispute resolution, learning theory, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here