Introducing professional development at undergraduate level

Maddocks, A and Sher, W (1999) Introducing professional development at undergraduate level. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

The Chartered Institute of Building has recently introduced the Professional Development Programme (PDP) as the principal route to chartered status for university graduates. We are seeking to prepare students by inducting them in the processes of such a competence based programme through encouraging the 'recording of achievement' and the development of skill. Our experiences in preparing first-year undergraduate students to make use of the RAPID (Recording Achievement for Professional and Individual Development) Progress File for these purposes reveal a number of salutary lessons. A survey of students involved in the induction programme reveals both a general disinterest in these processes and difficulty in applying the activities at a basic level. This highlights the challenges of promoting the concepts of personal and professional development, competence based learning, and the skills of reflecting upon and recording achievement in a traditional learning environment. We are drawn to conclude that such processes when introduced to students must be embedded within existing academic structures and frameworks. In addition, we recommend that the higher education sector places a greater emphasis on the personal development of students, and that professional institutions need to provide greater incentives to encourage students to engage in their professional development at an early stage.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: competence based programme; induction; progress file; rapid; recording achievement
Index terms: survey, programme, undergraduate, professional development, higher education, personal development, competence
Subjects: data collection methods, professional development, project controls, curriculum development, personnel development, educational institutions
Topics: Education, Information Management, Human Resources, Research Practice, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here