Discovering causality patterns of unsafe behavior leading to fall hazards on construction sites

Mohajeri, M; Ardeshir, A; Banki, M T and Malekitabar, H (2022) Discovering causality patterns of unsafe behavior leading to fall hazards on construction sites. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(15), pp. 3034-3044. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Unsafe behavior as a direct cause accounts for some 80% of accidents in the construction industry. While numerous studies have investigated the factors that influence unsafe behavior, most of them have approached the problem from a statistical standpoint, which is unable to provide causality patterns of how unsafe behavior forms. This paper illuminates the causality patterns obtained from a series of near-miss fall incidents through a practical study using a video camera system to record and analyze the unsafe behavior of workers. A total of 1347 cases of near-miss incidents were obtained in two weeks. Association Rules method was employed to verify the revealed causality patterns of workers' unsafe behavior, and a risk matrix was developed based on the indicators of rules to classify workers' risk level. Results indicate that habits, motivation, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms are the strongest contributing factors to unsafe behavior. While results introduce a new research perspective on the concept of construction safety behavior, the practical insights gained hereby enable construction managers to better analyze the combined negative effect of causal factors on workers' safety behavior.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: association rules; fall accident; near-miss; unsafe behavior
Index terms: construction safety, fall hazard, habit, construction manager, construction site, motivation, unsafe behaviour, subjective norm, construction industry, safety behaviour
Subjects: psychology, work location, profession, health behaviours and lifestyles, occupational health and safety management, social justice, industry analysis, environmental health, health risk and incident analysis, financial risk
Topics: Site Management, Ethics, Human Resources, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here