Othman, A A E and Mahmoud, N A (2022) Public-private partnerships as an approach for alleviating risks associated with adaptive reuse of heritage buildings in Egypt. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(9), pp. 1713-1735. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The status of heritage buildings in Egypt has remained threatened for decades as a result of many factors such as negligence, ignorance and lack of resources, which consequently led to degradation. Hence, opportunities to utilize these buildings efficiently are wasted. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings has proven to be a beneficial, yet risky approach in Egypt. Additionally, the pressuring demands on the government to conserve these heritage buildings and satisfy other public demands have been growing even more recently. Accordingly, there is a need for the involvement of the private sector to aid the government in its adaptive reuse initiatives and managing its associated risks. Public-private partnerships (PPP) for heritage conservation have been successfully conducted in various developed countries. However, such an approach has received little attention in Egypt and developing countries. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of PPPs between the public sector (governmental bodies) and the private sector (mainly Architectural Design Firms (ADFs) and heritage developers) as an approach towards alleviating risks associated with adaptive reuse of heritage buildings in Egypt. The research contributes to the field of study by identifying and analysing a set of adaptive reuse risks of heritage buildings that could be used by governmental authorities and architects/developers to understand and manage such risks through risk sharing in PPPs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; conservation; heritage buildings; public private partnerships; risk allocation |
| Index terms: | developed country, heritage building, architectural design, developing country, negligence, risk allocation, architect, conservation, public private partnership, Egypt, public sector, adaptive reuse, degradation, partnership, private sector |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, material degradation and durability, environmental policy, profession, construction type, administrative law, industry analysis, liability law, partnership management, sustainable design, Geography, development economics, financial risk, design practice |
| Topics: | International Construction, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here