Ozcan-Deniz, G (2022) Construction management education in cyberspace: A critical review and analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(1), pp. 8-18. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The learning era of construction management (CM) has been enriched with the introduction of cyberspace, where the traditional learning process was exchanged with a smart learning environment. Despite the benefits of technical improvements, cyberspace has brought pedagogical challenges in motivating and assessing students. The main problem has become finding and choosing the most effective technology for cyber educators, who are challenged with technological improvements and lack of a comprehensive review and analysis on previous cyberlearning applications. This gap in literature has been the motive to prepare a review on a selection of cyberlearning tools and methods in CM education. The purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive literature review on the history of computer tools and how the key ways of using technology have been used to promote CM learning in cyberspace. A critical literature review was combined with means and methods of teaching in previous studies to assess a variety of cyberlearning applications such as virtual reality technologies, simulation and gaming and Cyber-Physical Systems. This study is valuable for CM education educators and research to learn about the applications and trends in CM cyberlearning, as well as gaps in the knowledge to fill.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management education; cyber-physical systems; gaming; literature review; virtual reality |
| Index terms: | history, virtual reality technology, literature review, construction management education, gaming, virtual reality, motive |
| Subjects: | professional education, decision-making and reasoning, data analysis and analytics, architectural and construction history, psychology, virtual reality |
| Topics: | Education, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here