Panojan, P; Perera, B A K S and Dilakshan, R (2022) Work-life balance of professional quantity surveyors engaged in the construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), pp. 751-768. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Job demands compel construction professionals to work longer than what they are contractually obliged to. A study conducted in Africa revealed that most quantity surveyors (QSs) do not have job satisfaction for want of leisure time. Unlike the case of other professionals, there are hardly any studies done on the work life balance (WLB) of QSs despite their significant contribution to the construction industry. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the WLB of QSs working in Sri Lanka. A literature survey was first conducted and its findings were validated using 12 expert interviews through which additional information specific to QSs was also gathered. The findings of a questionnaire survey conducted subsequently among 115 professionals were ranked using Factorial ANOVA. WLB of QSs is found to depend on their gender and experience and deadlines is found to be its most influencing factor. Stress is one significant consequence of poor WLB. Yoga and meditation are found to minimize stress and other consequences of poor WLB. Factors affecting WLB can have a high impact on the technical and business cultures of organizations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | consequences; factors; quantity surveyors; solutions; work life balance |
| Index terms: | quantity surveying, influencing factor, Africa, job satisfaction, construction professional, Sri Lanka, construction industry, job demand, work-life balance, business culture, interview, survey, questionnaire, meditation |
| Subjects: | professional development, Geography, management, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, sociology, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession, regions and continents |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here