Stochastic analyses for managing risk of delay in duri oil construction projects, Indonesia

Sandhyavitri, A (2022) Stochastic analyses for managing risk of delay in duri oil construction projects, Indonesia. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(4), pp. 711-731. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

This article objective was to identify, assess, simulate, and mitigate risks of delay for the construction of new pressure maintenance (NPM) project located in Duri, Indonesia, based on the combination of stochastic and sensitivity analyses. These both analyses methods are not new but relatively unique to be applied in the area of oil industry especially in Indonesia in generating specific result findings. There were identified 16 major activities are sensitive causing the construction delay. Five significant risks such as; delay in procuring labors, material, and equipment, as well as changes in design and specifications, contributed to the project delay. Based on the stochastic risk analyses, it was identified that an 80% probability of the project would delay for 48 working days. These risks were classified as a high-risk project (delay > 20% from the initial construction project schedule). After conducting risk simulation and risk mitigation measures there were 80% probabilities for reducing the construction delay up to 52.08%. The application of these methods and 6 stages in managing risks would be as an important reference for the oil industry stakeholders in the identification, assessing, and mitigating any possible delays and risks during the construction phase systematically.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction delay; mitigation; oil projects; probabilities; risks; sensitivity; stochastic
Index terms: sensitivity analysis, specification, risk mitigation, risk analysis, project delay, stochastic analysis, construction delay, construction project, mitigation, Indonesia, construction phase
Subjects: project delivery, mathematical modelling, project controls, environmental hazards, Geography, contractual condition, production management, financial risk
Topics: Time Control, Contract Administration, Sustainability, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here