Tavakolan, M and Nikoukar, S (2022) Developing an optimization financing cost-scheduling trade-off model in construction project. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(2), pp. 262-277. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Time-cost trade-off analysis is one of the most challenging tasks of construction project planners. Project planners face complicated multivariate time-cost optimization problems that require simultaneous minimization of total project duration and total project cost while considering issues related to the optimal present value of profit. In addition, given the complexity of construction projects in recent years, clever management has become increasingly important in cases of project financing and scheduling. There are choices and limits that make it difficult for project planners to develop a proper financing plan considering project time status. Therefore, the methods of financing affect the project plan. Parameters such as interest rate, contract terms, and financing options (i.e., types of the loan) in the project construction period can change the final profit value of the project. Hence, a skilled planner should consider various effective parameters for scheduling projects. This study presents a hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm to solve a multi-objective optimization problem in construction project planning and financing. The main objective of the model is to present a Pareto chart that shows the trade-off between duration of the project and the financing cost by considering different durations for each activity of the project and various financing options. The model is first validated in a simple case study and then applied to a large-scale case study. The model shows the optimal solutions which have time and financing cost. For each optimal solution, the model will create a cash flow containing project (direct and indirect cost and payments) and financing flows (borrowed money and repayments of principal and interest) based on a work schedule. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to examine the effects of changes in the various parameters of the project cash flow on the ultimate results. It is shown that the proposed model is superior to the existing models in finding better project planning solutions with lower total project duration and lower total project financing cost in the proposed construction project financing problems. In addition, the proposed model improves the solutions through generations and provides optimal solutions in acceptable processing time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow; financing cost; hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm; large-scale project; multi-objective optimization; scheduling |
| Index terms: | option, time-cost trade-off, duration, planner, multi-objective optimization, case study, heuristic, indirect cost, contract term, complexity, financing, project planning, interest rate, construction project, project cost, profit, face, scheduling, sensitivity analysis, minimization, cost optimization, cash flow |
| Subjects: | psychology, operations research, economic analysis, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, control systems, project controls, decision analysis, environmental hazards, cost management, systems engineering, financial management, quantity surveying, algorithms, economics, production management, contractual condition |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Time Control, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here