Tavassolirizi, M; Sarvari, H; Chan, D W M and Olawumi, T O (2022) Factors affecting delays in rail transportation projects using analytic network process: The case of Iran. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), pp. 2712-2723. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Delays in the implementation and commissioning of rail transportation projects can cause economic damages to project stakeholders and the cities linked by such rail networks. Hence, the current study aims to investigate the key delay factors and provides salient recommendations. In this study, multi-criteria decision-making–the Analytic Network Process (ANP) and the DEMATEL (Decision Making trial and evaluation laboratory) method was employed to help decision-makers in prioritizing these delay factors and evaluating their interactions, respectively. A Delphi approach was used to validate the study’s findings via expert questionnaire surveys–based on a rail transportation development project for the Mobarakeh Steel Complex (MSC). The study’s findings revealed the management factors as the most important delay factors, followed closely by the financial, design, and implementation factors. Other potent issues include the existence of numerous decision-making stations, lack of central role, and sufficient authority for the project managers are responsible for project delays. Overall, the results show that resolving problems with the 'management' domain can significantly avoid or alleviate the extent of delays in rail transportation development projects. The study’s findings and recommendations can serve as a policy and consultative instrument for the relevant stakeholders in the railway industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic network process; decision Making trial and evaluation laboratory; Iran; project delays; rail transportation project |
| Index terms: | prioritizing, project manager, analytic network process, interaction, implementation, laboratory, multi-criteria decision-making, transportation project, transportation development, survey, damages, decision-making, commissioning, questionnaire, project stakeholder, project delay |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, data collection methods, profession, contractual arrangements, urban planning, behavioral psychology, completion, decision-making and optimization, infrastructure and transport systems, research management, decision analysis, sociology, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here