Toriola-Coker, L O; Alaka, H; Agbali, M; Bello, W A; Pathirage, C and Oyedele, L (2022) Marginalization of end-user stakeholder's in public private partnership road projects in Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(11), pp. 2098-2107. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The operational phase of public private partnership (PPP) projects in Nigeria has consistently witnessed serious challenges. Researches by various authors suggest that the major factors militating against the successful growth and development of PPP projects in Nigeria and other developing countries of the world is the marginalization of end-user stakeholder in PPP projects. As such, this study set out to reveal factors affecting the successful management of the diverse interests of end-user stakeholders of the PPP road projects in Nigeria. Using factors from related literature, a questionnaire was developed and distributed to users of two major PPP road in operation in Nigeria: Lekki/Epe Toll and Apakun Murtala Mohammed PPP toll road. A total of 282 questionnaires were returned representing 70.5% response rate. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to check reliability levels of the questionnaire variables (i.e., Likert scale questions) while factor analysis was used to establish the underlying factors affecting the successful participation of end-users stakeholders in PPP road in Nigeria. These underlying factors were fully discussed. It was concluded that active involvement of end-users stakeholders in decision-making from inception to conclusion will solve the problem of marginalization of end-user stakeholder’s in Nigeria PPP road projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | factor analysis; public-private partnership; questionnaire; road construction project; end-user; stakeholder |
| Index terms: | Likert scale, questionnaire, decision-making, developing country, toll, road construction, factor analysis, road project, public private partnership, Nigeria, partnership |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data collection methods, statistical analysis, transportation engineering, decision analysis, partnership management, infrastructure engineering, development economics, Geography, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here