Vahabi, A; Nasirzadeh, F and Mills, A (2022) Impact of project briefing clarity on construction project performance. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(13), pp. 2504-2516. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Defining a clear project brief at an early stage is critical for the project success. A lack of project brief clarity can cause design and construction changes or errors throughout project delivery, which ultimately leads to project time and cost overruns. This research proposes a dynamic simulation model to evaluate the overall impact of briefing on cost and time performance of construction projects. The causal feedback loop model portraying the impact of briefing on project cost and time performance is developed. The interrelationships that exist among the influencing factors incorporated into the stock and flow model of the project briefing. Then, the proposed model is applied in a road project to assess its applicability and performance. The results indicate that a clear project brief aid in reducing brief changes, design changes, and construction changes throughout project delivery, which can ultimately improve project cost and time performance. Despite the fact that the clear brief increases required budget and duration for the project briefing, it still represents good value to the project cost and time performance overall.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | briefing; feedback loop; project performance; system dynamics |
| Index terms: | system dynamics, design change, cost overrun, duration, design and construction, project delivery, project briefing, influencing factor, time performance, construction project, project success, feedback loop, project performance, project cost, briefing, road project |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, infrastructure engineering, project delivery, computing systems, scope management, project management theory and practice, economics, project controls, risk assessment, production management, control systems |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here