Wuni, I Y and Shen, G Q (2022) Towards a decision support for modular integrated construction: An integrative review of the primary decision-making actors. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), pp. 929-948. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Where circumstances merit and favourable conditions prevail, modular integrated construction (MiC) becomes a superior choice of construction method over the traditional approach. For many types of buildings, MiC is becoming a preferred alternative to traditional construction. However, the decision to use MiC must be made after critical analysis because several key factors and conditions need to converge to make MiC economical and feasible. As a result, this research conducted a systematic review of the determinant factors in deciding to use MiC in a project. The literature analysis identified 51 decision-making factors (DMFs) for implementing MiC. Of these, the top 5 most cited DMFs include availability of skilled and experienced factory labour force; availability of skilled management and supervising team; demanding and tight project schedule; transport infrastructure, size restrictions, and equipment availability; and need for improved construction safety. The study proposed a conceptual framework for the identified DMFs consisting of labour considerations; project characteristics; location and site attributes; and organizational factors. A stage-gate model is proposed to demonstrate the MiC implementation decision-making process. Thus, the paper contributes to a better theoretical and practical understanding of the primary DMFs for implementing MiC and will help to maximize benefits and minimize risk.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision support system; decision-making factors; determinant factors; modular integrated construction; review |
| Index terms: | traditional construction, decision-making process, labour force, decision-making, organizational factor, decision support, construction safety, implementation, determinant, construction method, becoming, conceptual framework, systematic literature review, transport infrastructure |
| Subjects: | environmental health, economics, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, philosophical process, research evaluation and metrics, decision analysis, building construction, theoretical framing, heritage and conservation, risk assessment, business |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Site Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here