Wuni, I Y; Shen, G Q and Osei-Kyei, R (2022) Quantitative evaluation and ranking of the critical success factors for modular integrated construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(11), pp. 2108-2120. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Modular integrated construction (MiC) is becoming a preferred construction approach for many types of building projects. However, several factors and conditions must converge to determine the success of MiC projects. This research identified and evaluated 25 critical success factors (CSFs) for implementing MiC projects. The dataset was generated through a structured questionnaire survey and analyzed using robust statistical techniques. Based on the mean scores, the top five CSFs for MiC projects include fabricator experience and capabilities in modules design and production; robust drawing specifications and early design freeze; good working collaboration, communication and information sharing among project participants; standardization and mass production; and effective coordination of the supply chain segments. An exploratory factor analysis generated four principal success factors (PSFs), comprising adequate technical capability and infrastructure; effective stakeholder and supply chain management; early commitment; and standardization and benchmarking. A fuzzy evaluation revealed that all the four PSFs are paramount to the success of MiC projects. As a contribution, the research has identified and prioritized the CSFs which may help MiC project managers and stakeholders in the appropriate allocation of limited resources. These shared CSFs may constitute forecasting and diagnostic tools for progressively measuring success along the MiC project lifecycle phases.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; fuzzy synthetic modelling; modular integrated construction; off-site manufacturing |
| Index terms: | modelling, coordination, standardization, module, information sharing, project lifecycle, project manager, forecasting, becoming, critical success factor, dataset, benchmarking, collaboration, construction project, questionnaire, commitment, drawing, success factor, survey, off-site manufacturing, exploratory factor analysis, specification |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, philosophical process, data management, production management, contractual condition, data exchange, architectural elements, manufacturing engineering, management, performance measurement, analytical methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, prediction and forecasting, technical documentation, psychology, control systems, project completion, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here