Xiong, B; Newton, S and Skitmore, M (2022) Towards a conceptual model of the job performance of construction professionals: A person-environment fit perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(7), pp. 1308-1322. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is well known for low productivity, with a critical obstacle being the difficulties associated with understanding the mechanism of job performance. This due to established theories being incapable of capturing and dealing with the complexities associated with construction projects, with extant performance studies falling short in the context of complex projects by not grounding the factors involved in a common conceptual model that articulates the mechanics of job performance. In response, this study builds on person-environment (P-E) fit theory using a stimulus-organism-response paradigm, to develop a foundational conceptual model of the performance-related working behaviors of construction professionals. This study emphasizes the mediating role of P-E fit assessment and integrates key P-E relationships in a simplified framework, with a common layer based on P-E fit assessment factors that both accommodates previous studies and lays a coherent foundation for future studies. The model can also be applied in a reverse, diagnostic, capacity to identify corrective approaches and appropriate management strategies, and is easily adaptable to more general situations beyond the construction industry. Concluding remarks concern the major contributions made and prospects for future development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction professionals; job performance; person-environment fit; stimulus-organism-response |
| Index terms: | complexity, construction project, complex project, construction industry, future study, paradigm, construction professional, productivity, management strategy |
| Subjects: | professional development, production management, education and knowledge transfer, management, systems engineering, industry analysis, research design and methodology, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here