Chinese perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An analysis of annual reports in the housing sector (Chinese perceptions of corporate social responsibility)

Xiong, B; Ye, K; Skitmore, M; Jiang, W and Qin, B (2022) Chinese perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An analysis of annual reports in the housing sector (Chinese perceptions of corporate social responsibility). International Journal of Construction Management, 22(13), pp. 2586-2597. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been widely accepted as essential for sustainable development and, with the occurrence of such disasters as food quality scandals and building collapses, its importance has been increasingly recognised in China over the past decade. At the same time, despite property development being frequently linked in the mass media with unaffordable housing prices, bribery, and poor construction quality, many large developers have instituted programmes to improve their CSR presence. However, the perceptions of property development organisations of what CSR means to them are as yet unclear. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to better understand the way CSR is seemingly perceived by property developers in China. This is undertaken by analysing CSR disclosure and prioritising information from CSR corporate reports by developers in the housing sector. Three attributes of CSR disclosure information type, responsibility type, and stakeholder type are used to construct an analytical framework for testing of 44 published company reports by content analysis. The findings indicate a greater emphasis on management approaches and ethical responsibilities than commercial goals, with industry and ownership differences pointing to the need to be recognised by the public and future decision-makers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; corporate social responsibility; industry differences; ownership differences; perceptions; property developers
Index terms: ownership, presence, media, corporate social responsibility, property development, testing, prioritizing, analytical framework, China, housing, construction quality, content analysis, annual report, sustainable development, programme
Subjects: decision analysis, sociology, project controls, quality assurance, economics, economic development, Geography, health safety and environment, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, business, construction type
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Time Control, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here