Zhang, Q; Oo, B L and Lim, B T H (2022) Corporate social responsibility practices by leading construction firms in China: A case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), pp. 1420-1431. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices by construction firms have attracted various attentions in recent years owing to the environmental and social challenges confronted by the industry. This study investigates the CSR practices of five leading Chinese construction firms based on their annual CSR reports over a nine-year study period (2009–2017). Using content analysis, the specific objectives are to investigate: (i) the trends of their level of CSR practices implementation; and (ii) the factors influencing their CSR practices implementation. The results show that there are 79 CSR practices that can be classified into 32 sub-aspects, and 17 factors influencing their implementation of CSR practices. There are increasing trends of their CSR practices implementation levels over the study period. Although the evidence is suggestive that these trends would increase in the future, the implementation levels do vary across the five case firms. CSR communicating, biodiversity and ecology protection, and employees' education and training are the top three sub-aspects of CSR practices prioritized by all case firms. The top three factors influencing their CSR practices implementation are award or certification, organizational culture, and governmental policy. The findings provide an useful insight for a better contextualization of CSR practices in the Chinese construction industry context, which has implications on the industry stakeholders' attempts in driving firms' implementation of CSR practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Chinese construction firms; corporate social responsibility practices; implementation; trend |
| Index terms: | construction firm, content analysis, certification, organizational culture, China, evidence, ecology, case study, biodiversity, education and training, corporate social responsibility, construction industry, implementation |
| Subjects: | environmental science, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, industry analysis, administrative processes, professional education, sociology, health safety and environment, Geography, biodiversity |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Education, Contract Administration, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here