Contractor selection: A review of qualification and pre-qualification systems

Acheamfour, V K; Adjei-Kumi, T and Kissi, E (2023) Contractor selection: A review of qualification and pre-qualification systems. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(2), pp. 338-348. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The impact of contractor selection on construction project success has led to numerous studies on contractor selection. However, an up-to-date systematic review of contractor selection trend is still lacking. This study aims to fill the gap by reviewing published literature from 1990 to 2019. A desktop search was conducted under the 'T/A/K (title/abstract/keyword)' in Scopus search engine where 252 papers were identified. Based on a two-phase filtering approach, which included journal relevance assessment and article relevance assessment, 137 published papers within 22 journals were used for the study. The major finding was that the questions were raised on the suitability of selection criteria for appraising contractors and it was acknowledged that, choosing appropriate contractor selection criteria are affected by other factors hence can be regarded as a Multiple Criteria Decision Making problem suitable for machine learning tools. A major limitation of was that, even with the 137 reviewed papers, not all contractor selection-related papers were reviewed. The outcome of the study suggests a greater involvement of practitioners in model development and stimulates future studies that delve into the development of models to aid in selecting optimal contractor selection criteria for a particular project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractor pre-qualification; contractor qualification; contractor selection
Index terms: practitioner, construction project, machine learning, systematic literature review, suitability, future study, qualification, journal, model development, contractor selection, decision-making, selection criteria, pre-qualification, contractor pre-qualification
Subjects: production management, research dissemination and communication, decision analysis, research evaluation and metrics, design criteria, tendering, analytical methods, artificial intelligence, practitioner, educational resources, research design and methodology
Topics: Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Education, Digital Applications, Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here