The impacts of social responsibility on the environmental sustainability performance of the Malaysian construction industry

Ajibike, W A; Adeleke, A Q; Mohamad, F; Bamgbade, J A and Moshood, T D (2023) The impacts of social responsibility on the environmental sustainability performance of the Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), pp. 780-789. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Properly harnessed social responsibility is vital for construction organization’s environmental sustainability as it provides a resource for their competitive edge in construction project delivery. This study examines the impacts of social responsibility on Malaysian construction firms' environmental sustainability performance. A cross-sectional survey of 185 questionnaires was administered to respondents from Malaysian G7 construction firms. PLS path modelling outcomes show that social responsibility and coercive pressure are positive predictors of environmental sustainability performance. The results also established that, despite the charitable nature of social responsibility, construction firms are still obliged to be socially responsible through investment in environmental and social responsibility activities. This could result from conformity with guidelines that mandated them to spend on social responsibility activities and secure legitimacy from multiple stakeholders. Our results also reveal that coercive pressure transmits the positive effects of social responsibility on environmental sustainability performance. Thus, it was established that coercive pressure is a positive mediator and a facilitator that plays a complementary role between social responsibility and environmental sustainability performance. The implications and recommendations for future research are also discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coercive pressure; corporate social responsibility; environmental sustainability; mediator
Index terms: legitimacy, environmental sustainability, social responsibility, questionnaire, construction firm, survey, construction project delivery, construction industry, modelling, corporate social responsibility, facilitator, mediator, construction organization
Subjects: health safety and environment, industry analysis, project controls, sociology, practitioner, dispute resolution, data collection methods, organization, analytical methods
Topics: Legal Issues, Time Control, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here