Akinradewo, O; Aigbavboa, C; Aghimien, D; Oke, A and Ogunbayo, B (2023) Modular method of construction in developing countries: The underlying challenges. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(8), pp. 1344-1354. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Modular construction has been identified as a major part of the continuous improvement being experienced in site procedures and construction processes globally. Few construction projects are being executed using modular building components in developing countries. This study is aimed at assessing the challenges to the implementation of the modular method of construction (MMC) with a focus on developing countries using two major states in Nigeria as a case study. A quantitative research approach was adopted with the design of a questionnaire survey. The study engaged construction professionals such as Quantity Surveyors, Architects, Engineers, Builders and Project Managers in Nigeria. Data retrieved were analysed using percentile, mean item score, Kruskal-Wallis H-Test as well as exploratory factor analysis. The findings showed that construction practitioners are faced with the challenge of finding a compromise between the cost of the project and the value obtainable by using MMC. The challenges were further classified into construction industry practices, client concerns and site characteristics. Practically, the study revealed the need for the proper enlightenment of both construction practitioners and clients with regards to the inherent value of the MMC. This involves the inclusion of MMC requirements in the client’s information requirement for the construction project, the tender pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ), and the contractor’s technical method statement for the construction project. Theoretically, the study serves as a good foundation for future research seeking to explore the use of MMC in developing countries. The study will assist construction organisations as well as the industry at large in shaping their policies to accommodate the use of innovative methods of construction by understanding the challenges that might hinder its effective implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | composite construction; modular construction; offsite construction; prefabrication |
| Index terms: | construction organization, quantity surveying, composite, quantitative research, project manager, case study, engineer, continuous improvement, Nigeria, construction professional, pre-qualification, architect, implementation, prefabrication, exploratory factor analysis, developing country, survey, builder, construction practitioner, modular building component, construction process, modular construction, construction project, questionnaire, construction industry practice |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, profession, data collection methods, organization, materials science, practitioner, building construction, statistical analysis, performance measurement, manufacturing engineering, management, tendering, Geography, production management, development economics, professional development |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Technology, International Construction, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here