Al-Atesh, E A; Rahmawati, Y; Zawawi, N A W A and Utomo, C (2023) A decision-making model for supporting selection of green building materials. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), pp. 922-933. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The manufacture and use of building materials result in numerous environmental concerns in the construction industry. Green building materials (GBMs) are environmentally friendly compared to their traditional counterparts. However, identifying the criteria for selecting GBMs and assessing their sustainability have been challenging. In this study, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used to decide between selecting steel building structure and reinforced concrete (RC) building structure as an alternative. In the first phase, the criteria for selecting GBMs were identified through literature review, experts' opinions, and questionnaire survey. In the second phase, the purposive sampling technique was used to select experts and professionals in materials selection to compare the different GBMs criteria and also, to compare and weight the provided alternatives. The findings of this study identified that 29 criteria were ranked using a scatter plot of means and standard deviation scores. Besides, the results indicated that RC building structure, with a weight value of 0.5225, was a better alternative to steel building structure. Additionally, the results show that the environmental and economic criteria are more important than the social criteria. This study, therefore, developed a decision-making model for helping stakeholders to select materials required to achieve sustainable buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process; green building materials; materials selection; sustainability criteria |
| Index terms: | decision-making, sustainable building, questionnaire, reinforced concrete, green building material, literature review, survey, building material, construction industry, purposive sampling, environmentally friendly, deviation, environmental concern |
| Subjects: | environmental issues, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, building materials, sustainable design, sustainable construction, research methods, industry analysis, sustainable engineering, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here