Alzubi, K M; Alkhateeb, A M and Hiyassat, M A (2023) Factors affecting the job satisfaction of construction engineers: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(2), pp. 319-328. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Satisfaction of construction engineers affects the development of construction industry, and plays an important role in enhancing their productivity. In this paper, the researchers aim to determine the most significant factors affecting overall job satisfaction of construction engineers in Jordan and to develop a model that measures their satisfaction. To collect the required data, a questionnaire was developed and distributed among engineers working in different construction sites. Cronbach, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, and multicollinearity tests were conducted to attest the questionnaire's reliability and validity. Also, stepwise multiple regression analysis and hypotheses testing were used to verify the predictive factors of job satisfaction. As per the survey results, working environment, satisfaction with coworkers, pay and benefits, and satisfaction with supervision are the most significant factors out of ten affecting overall job satisfaction of construction engineers. Accordingly, a proposed model was developed to measure their job satisfaction using these four significant factors, and subsequently, was validated by interviewing experienced construction engineers. The proposed model can be useful in keeping track of job satisfaction of construction engineers not only in Jordan but also in other countries, especially those with similar culture.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction engineer; job satisfaction; Jordan; working environment |
| Index terms: | satisfaction, hypotheses testing, productivity, engineer, validity, job satisfaction, Jordan, construction industry, supervision, construction site, survey, questionnaire, evidence, multiple regression analysis |
| Subjects: | management, Geography, quantitative and statistical methods, industry analysis, statistical analysis, profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, control systems, work location, project delivery |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Site Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here