Anondho, B; Soeleiman, L; Latief, Y and Mochtar, K (2023) The influence of external factors on construction project performance based on estimated duration in Jakarta. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(13), pp. 2270-2278. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Estimation of project duration needs to be precise to support performance as a success factor. Obstacles occur when estimation is conducted in an environment with less precedent data or standardization. Although this is a common problem in developing countries, it decreases project performance due to the less precise estimation. Therefore, this research proposes the use of statistical external data as an alternative solution in developing indicators of a country. Statistical data is provided by Country Statistical Bureau, World Bank, or World Economic Forum. This research examines the correlation between identified dominant external as independent factors and duration prediction of ongoing construction projects in Jakarta, Indonesia as the dependent factor, which calculated using the Earned Schedule method. A multivariate factor analysis method was conducted to identify dominant factors, and multivariate linear regression analysis was performed between duration prediction and dominant factors. Furthermore, the study added the floor numbers and area to accommodate the building characteristic and using the determinant coefficient Goodness of Fit (R2) as sensibility benchmarks. The results show that the determination value (R2) is 76.3%, meaning that external factors and duration prediction have a good correlation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | duration prediction; earned schedule method; factor analysis; influence external factors; multivariate analysis |
| Index terms: | multivariate analysis, Jakarta, developing country, success factor, meaning, construction project, performance-based, Indonesia, estimation, World Bank, factor analysis, project performance, standardization, regression analysis, duration, determinant |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, institutional frameworks, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, development economics, Geography, production management, sociology, project controls, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, International Construction, Time Control, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Risk Management, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here