Proverbs, D G and Holt, G D (1999) The strive for productivity and quality: Views of UK project managers. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
Simultaneous improvement in productivity and quality has long been a goal in construction. Previous research and modern management philosophy postulates a positive relationship between these goals. However, the feasibility of consistently achieving this on a construction site remains rather a contentious issue. The views of 38 UK contractors' project managers regarding this and other (related) hypotheses are presented. Comparative evaluation of factors known to impact productivity and quality is presented, embracing the contribution of different project coalition members towards these performance aspects. The views of project managers are divided, but the majority subscribe to the view generally held, that a trade-off (i.e. inverse) relationship exists. It is shown that contractors are considered to have more control over these performance aspects than other coalition members and that, partnering would appear to be widely perceived as having a significant impact on both productivity and quality.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor; productivity; project manager; quality |
| Index terms: | project manager, productivity, philosophy, partnering, construction site |
| Subjects: | partnership management, work location, management, profession, philosophical studies |
| Topics: | Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here