Boadu, E F; Sunindijo, R Y; Wang, C C and Frimpong, S (2023) Factors constraining the promotion of health and safety in public works procurement in developing countries. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(9), pp. 1611-1621. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Public clients are generally expected to consider health and safety (H&S) in the project procurement process. However, there is evidence that in many developing countries, public clients do not adequately consider H&S in the procurement of public projects. This study therefore sought to understand this issue by exploring the constraints that hinder public clients from adequately promoting H&S in public works procurement. Using both qualitative and quantitative methods, semi-structured interviews were conducted with public clients and contractors, and a survey was conducted with public clients, contractors, and consultants. The interview data was analysed using inductive thematic analysis, while the survey data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Nine themes of constraints including regulatory; budgetary; human resource constraints; lack of management commitment; lack of H&S knowledge and education; unethical procurement practices; political influence; absence of guidance materials; and poor attitude towards H&S were identified. Based on the findings, this study recommended strategic interventions to promote the consideration of H&S in public procurement. This study contributes to the broader research on H&S management by focusing specifically on public clients in developing countries and providing an in-depth understanding of the issues which have implications for both developing and developed countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | constraints; developing countries; health and safety; public procurement |
| Index terms: | promotion, public client, statistics, public work, survey, commitment, health and safety, developing and developed country, interview, developing country, project procurement, thematic analysis, quantitative method, evidence, public project, human resource |
| Subjects: | sociology, health safety and environment, methods and analysis, development economics, infrastructure engineering, economic development, management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, psychology, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Human Resources, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here