Das, R and Nakano, M (2023) A multi-criteria decision-making model using socio-technical attributes for transportation bridge maintenance prioritisation. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(4), pp. 579-585. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Owing to budget constraints and the significant numbers of deficient bridges in various countries, a systematic approach is needed to more efficiently allocate limited resources to bridge maintenance efforts. It is well known that bridge maintenance is not solely a technical process; rather, it is a socio-technical problem. Therefore, multiple criteria should be considered, making it a multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This study presents an MCDM framework for prioritising bridge maintenance based on five criteria. The criteria are the bridge condition index, delay cost, truck effect, accessibility, and redundancy. Approaches for measuring each criterion have been described. Some variations of computation methods of the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) framework are explored. The results show that if higher-priority bridges fail, they incur higher social costs. Therefore, these bridges should be upgraded to minimise the potential social costs. This study provides a systematic and implementable approach for facilitating bridge maintenance decision-making, without requiring extra data collection efforts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bridge maintenance; multi-criteria decision making; network analysis; normalisation; TOPSIS |
| Index terms: | redundancy, multi-criteria decision-making, preference, computation, decision-making, variation, budget constraint, topsis, socio-technical, prioritizing, accessibility, network analysis |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, inclusive design, decision-making and optimization, decision analysis, computational methods, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here