Do, S T; Nguyen, V T; Tran, C N N and Aung, Z M (2023) Identifying and evaluating the key claim causes leading to construction delays. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(12), pp. 1999-2011. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Claim causes can lead to serious construction delays. No studies have been conducted to determine claim causes leading to the construction delays. The objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the key claim causes that contribute to the construction delays. A questionnaire survey is designed to collect data from practitioners. This study identifies forty-five claim causes leading to the construction delays. Using factor analysis technique, six key claim causes are discovered, namely contract’s problems, inappropriate action of owner, contractor’s lack of competence, impediment problems from owner/consultant, uncontrollable objective problems, and contractor’s bidding issues. The SEM model indicates that contract’s problems is the most important key cause, followed by inappropriate action of owner, while contractor's lack of competence is the least important key cause leading to construction delays. Impediment problems from owner/consultant, uncontrollable objective problems, and contractor’s bidding issues are quite influential in leading to construction delays. This study extends the body of knowledge related to claims in construction projects. The findings of the study may assist managers in minimizing claims that result in construction delays.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | claim causes; claims; construction delays; construction projects; structural equation modelling |
| Index terms: | owner, factor analysis, survey, structural equation modelling, manager, bidding, body of knowledge, questionnaire, practitioner, construction project, competence, construction delay |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, bidding, data collection methods, practitioner, project controls, sociology, statistical analysis, production management, personnel development |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here