Ebekozien, A; Abdul-Aziz, A R and Jaafar, M (2023) Mitigating high development cost of low-cost housing: Findings from an empirical investigation. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3), pp. 472-483. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The high development cost of Malaysian low-cost houses (LCH) remains one of the major encumbrances towards wide-scale development, and the worst hit is the low-income group. Several studies have investigated the causes with insufficient evidence and impassive in the possible policy solutions, thus, the issues remain. This paper attempts to identify the root cause and proffer possible policy solutions via an unexplored exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach. First, 40 participants were engaged and the qualitative findings were further analyzed by 149 suitable retrieved questionnaires. The 'quantilized findings' were validated by the Malaysian LCH policymakers. Findings show that provision of land and capital facilities to utility companies by housing developers, scarcity of land in cities, and construction cost increased over the years are the three major causes of high development cost. Waiving all forms of taxes for LCH, housing developers to embrace industrialized building systems, utility companies should provide land for their infrastructure and absorb the construction cost, ceiling price should be revised upward to RM65,000-RM70,000/unit (RM4.10/US$1) while the government subsidizes housing costs among others were recommended. This study adds a new perspective in mitigating high development costs by utilizing the Public Interest Theory of Regulation as one of the theoretical underpinnings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | high construction cost; housing developers; low-income earners; low-income houses; Malaysia |
| Index terms: | low-cost housing, regulation, public interest theory, evidence, questionnaire, housing developer, housing, Malaysia, industrialized building system, scale development, construction cost, investigation, low-income group, income, land |
| Subjects: | Geography, political science, economic theory, demography, housing and residential development, measurement and scaling, sociology, building construction, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis, financial and cost management, real estate economics |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here