Forghani, R; Sher, W and Kanjanabootra, S (2023) Critical technical design principles for maximizing the reuse of building components. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(7), pp. 1187-1195. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The reuse of building components plays a pivotal role in construction and demolition waste reduction. Reuse can be a part of the deconstruction process resulting in cost and environmental benefits. Several studies have identified various design principles that facilitate the deconstruction process. These may consequently maximize the reusability of building components. However, the extent to which these measures are effective is unclear. This study examines the importance of these principles in relation to the reusability of building components. A questionnaire survey investigating design principles based on previous studies was administered to building industry professionals including civil engineers, architects and demolition contractors. It was designed to determine the degree of suitability and relevance of the design principles to the practice of reuse. Over 170 responses were collected and analysed using a number of statistical approaches including ANOVA and factor analysis to identify critical technical design principles (TDPs) and to determine the potential relationships among them. Nine TDPs were identified as highly significant for the practice of reuse. Statistically significant differences between the opinions of demolition contractors and of building designers to eight principles were also determined and are also discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ANOVA; critical technical design principles; factor analysis; reusability; reusing building components |
| Index terms: | factor analysis, architect, building industry, designer, building component, suitability, waste reduction, questionnaire, civil engineer, survey, design principle, construction and demolition |
| Subjects: | sustainability assessment, architectural elements, industry analysis, design criteria, statistical analysis, waste management, design methods, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here