BIM-based clash detection improvement automatically

Hasannejad, A; Sardrud, J M and Shirzadi Javid, A A (2023) BIM-based clash detection improvement automatically. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(14), pp. 2431-2437. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Building Information Modelling (BIM) has created a fundamental change in the field of designing and management of construction projects. Due to the visual and parametric capabilities of BIM, it improves the efficiency of the task. In the design phases, the BIM drawings and plans prepared by individual designers, are integrated and reviewed in a federated model. In this process, several clashes have occurred that can be detected by BIM tools such as Autodesk Navisworks. these clashes are including a large number of irrelevant clashes, that require no changes or have a clear resolution. Therefore improvement of clash detection accuracy is a majority for the success of BIM applications. In this article, clashes which detected by BIM tools are automatically grouped to determine the priority of resolving and to identified irrelevant clashes. Also, the results of Autodesk Navisworks have been used to improve the process of clash detection. This study used naviswork`s API and coded a plugin to automatically improve clash detection. research`s plugin provide a basis for prioritizing clashes for their resolution. The case study showed that applying the proposed plugin can be identified importance and irrelevant clashes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: autodesk navisworks; building information modelling; case study; clash detection
Index terms: designer, building information modelling, efficiency, case study, prioritizing, resolution, design phase, drawing, accuracy, construction project
Subjects: production management, professional development, performance management, information systems, conflict resolution, decision analysis, profession, data collection methods, professional practice, technical documentation
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here