Lu, W; Ghansah, F A and Xu, J (2023) A category and index hybrid (cih) approach to measuring the level of prefabrication. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), pp. 2658-2669. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Two generic approaches exist to measuring the level of prefabrication (LoP) in construction. One is the 'category' approach to indicating which prefabrication type a building adopts. Another is the 'index' approach to measuring the ratio of prefabrication in the total construction volume. However, existing studies still face difficulty in understanding the true picture of prefabrication in a building project by adopting either category or index approach. To address this issue, this study aims to develop a 'category and index hybrid' (CIH) approach to measuring the LoP holistically. Firstly, a tentative CIH model was developed. Then, the model was used to measure 15 sizeable high-rise building projects in Hong Kong, which have adopted different prefabrication components. Finally, the approach was presented to industrial stakeholders for validation via interviews on its strengths, weaknesses, and prospective applications. A strong positive correlation was revealed between Levels 0 and 1 prefabrication usage based on Pearson correlation, r. It also found that the CIH approach’s 'category' component allows people to quickly grasp a building’s prefabrication types, while its 'index' component allows a numerical understanding of prefabrication in the entire construction. The interview results denoted that the CIH approach can enable a series of meaningful applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | category and index hybrid approach; level of prefabrication; measurement; prefabrication forms |
| Index terms: | prefabrication, Hong Kong, validation, high-rise building, interview, face |
| Subjects: | building construction, Geography, professional development, psychology, data collection methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here