Scott, D and Pang, C K (1999) Helping professionals make good use of the internet. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
Searching for data using Internet search engines allows identification and collection of single items of data without difficulty. However, a multi-facet, multi-source search for professional (and perhaps business) purposes is difficult to co-ordinate and often frustrated by either too many possible sources or too few. In many ways this is a problem similar to data/records kept in an old-fashioned filing system, finding a single item with a particular attribute is quite straightforward but identifying groups with a variety of pre-specified characteristics often proves more difficult or impossible. This paper reports work which has been done to provide services/web-site that collects and stores information and the search systems that are being developed using the Concept search philosophy. The paper also describes and demonstrates the integration and application of an intelligent Concept search into the Construction and Real Estate Information Service system so that the amount and quality of data is of actual practical use to construction professionals searching for reliable information which is relevant to their work but which is needed within a short period of time.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concept search; database; information; internet; search |
| Index terms: | search engines, real estate, integration, internet, database, construction professional, philosophy |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, professional development, philosophical studies, computing systems, information science, real estate economics, data management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here