Malek, M S and Bhatt, V (2023) Examine the comparison of CSFs for public and private sector's stakeholders: A SEM approach towards PPP in Indian road sector. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(13), pp. 2239-2248. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Critical Success Factors (CSFs) are considered essential parameters for the Government projects through which the project is procured using Public-Private Partnership (PPP) by the Government. This research aims to recognize and assess CSFs affecting the Indian PPP road projects. In the Initial stage, using literature review, forty-one CSFs were scrutinized and validated by private and public experts. The researcher performed a questionnaire survey amongst key stakeholders of Indian PPP road projects. Identified factors were grouped into six stages. This research analyzed the relationship between the six stages and the impact of the public and private sector on each CSF with structural equation modelling (SEM). The study findings indicate a positive relationship amongst various phases of a construction project. The impact of the public and private sector varies in nineteen factors and matches in eighteen factors. The findings facilitate professionals to emphasize selective factors for securing better output in PPP road projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | critical success factors; public-private partnership; roads; structural equation modelling |
| Index terms: | government project, private sector, partnership, road project, survey, literature review, structural equation modelling, critical success factor, questionnaire, construction project |
| Subjects: | infrastructure engineering, production management, statistical analysis, administrative law, industry analysis, partnership management, control systems, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here