Osei-Kyei, R; Jin, X; Nnaji, C; Akomea-Frimpong, I and Wuni, I Y (2023) Review of risk management studies in public-private partnerships: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(14), pp. 2419-2430. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This paper reviews the trend of research studies on risk management in public-private partnerships (PPP). Bibliometric data of 1730 publications were retrieved from Scopus using selected keywords between 1989 and 2019. The VOS viewer software was then used to conduct a scientometric analysis of the normative literature. The review outcomes show that research on PPP risk management has generally increased over the last decades, however, a significant increase in publications was realized in 2005. This reinforces assertions that risk management is an essential issue in PPP practice globally. Further, the three most productive countries of PPP risk management research are the U.S., China and, the U.K. Lastly, it was found that majority of the PPP risk management studies have focused on only four key areas of the conventional risk management framework process, and this includes risk identification and assessment, risk allocation/sharing, risk analytical models and techniques, and risk mitigation. Other areas including risk treatment, risk monitoring and review have not been properly explored which makes the PPP risk management framework process inconclusive. The present study contributes to PPP knowledge by providing a general overview of risk management in PPP, thereby creating a solid platform for future research efforts in this critical domain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | public-private partnership; review; risk allocation; risk assessment; risk management; scientometric analysis |
| Index terms: | platform, partnership, risk management, risk allocation, risk assessment, monitoring, risk identification, publication, analytical model, China, risk mitigation |
| Subjects: | Geography, financial risk, digital design, theoretical framing, partnership management, control systems, risk assessment, research dissemination and communication |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here