Delays in building construction projects in Ghana

Fugar, F D K and Agyakwah-Baah, A B (2010) Delays in building construction projects in Ghana. Construction Economics and Building, 10(1-2), pp. 103-116. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

This study investigates the causes of delay of building construction projects in Ghana to determine the most important according to the key project participants; clients, consultants, and contractors. Thirty-two possible causes of delay were identified from the literature and semi-structured interviews of 15 key players in the implementation process. These delay factors were further categorised into nine major groups. The list of delay causes was subjected to a questionnaire survey for the identification of the most important causes of delay. The field survey included 130 respondents made up of 39 contractors, 37 clients and 54 consultants. The relative importance of the individual causes and the groups were calculated and ranked by their relative importance index. The overall results of the study indicate that the respondents generally agree that financial group factors ranked highest among the major factors causing delay in construction projects in Ghana. The financial group factors were delay in honouring payment certificates, difficulty in accessing credit and fluctuation in prices. Materials group factors are second followed by scheduling and controlling factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building construction projects; delay causes; Ghana
Index terms: Ghana, survey, implementation, relative importance index, building construction, questionnaire, causes of delay, scheduling, relative importance, construction project, interview
Subjects: contractual arrangements, operations research, building construction, project controls, Geography, production management, risk assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Time Control, Risk Management, Procurement, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here