Development and comparative analysis of the fuzzy inference system-based construction labor productivity models

Sarihi, M; Shahhosseini, V and Banki, M T (2023) Development and comparative analysis of the fuzzy inference system-based construction labor productivity models. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(3), pp. 423-433. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The current practice to estimate construction labor productivity (CLP) lacks a systematic approach to measure and estimate it. Moreover, modeling CLP is challenging because, in addition to the realistic constraints of multiple factors, subjective assessments, low-quality data, and limited datasets, the complex relationship between multiple factors should also be considered simultaneously. Such challenges were addressed in this paper through developing, optimizing, and validating a series of CLP models. Appropriation of using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to model CLP has been previously tested. However, ANNs cannot incorporate linguistic assessment of qualitative influential factors, which is indispensable for CLP modeling. Therefore, the current paper also proposed two CLP modeling methods based on a fuzzy inference system (FIS). This study contributes to the construction engineering and management body of knowledge by proposing a modeling technique, capable of dealing with a combination of crisp and fuzzy input variables. Moreover, a comparative analysis helps researchers and practitioners choose the appropriate method according to the nature of their projects, and through its implementation, estimate the productivity with a level of accuracy and interpretability greater than what could be offered by previous techniques.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system; artificial intelligence; artificial neural network; construction labor productivity; fuzzy inference system; qualitative variables
Index terms: fuzzy inference, comparative analysis, accuracy, artificial neural network, practitioner, influential factor, body of knowledge, dataset, productivity, construction engineering, construction labour, artificial intelligence, modelling, estimate, implementation
Subjects: data management, decision-making and optimization, management, engineering methods, professional development, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, analytical methods, risk assessment, practitioner
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here