Sayed, M; Abdel-Hamid, M and El-Dash, K (2023) Improving cost estimation in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(1), pp. 135-143. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The accurate cost estimate is one of the success keys to construction projects. The influence of inaccurate cost estimation on construction projects is critical. There is no consensus among researchers about the most important factors influencing the cost estimate accuracy. The study’s objective is to get an accurate cost estimate because the precise cost estimate keeps all parties focused on delivering the project within the budget. This objective is achieved by collecting the influential factors from the literature review and creating a powerful arithmetical model of cost estimation. Twenty-nine factors were collected by reviewing many researches. A questionnaire was prepared and then was examined by fourteen project managers. Pareto technique was conducted to get the foremost influential factors. Based on the Pareto technique, the 29 factors were reduced to nine. Then, a powerful arithmetical model was created in this study to get an accurate cost estimate. Finally, fourteen finished projects were selected to be case studies. The cost variance percentages were between 1% and 15% for each case study. By using the model, the estimated contract value of each case study was recalculated and, the cost variance percentages were between 0.5% and 0.8% for each case study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost estimation; pareto technique; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | cost variance, cost estimate, case study, project manager, questionnaire, construction project, influential factor, survey, literature review, cost estimating, cost estimate accuracy |
| Subjects: | financial analysis, production management, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here