Dynamic modeling to reduce the cost of quality in construction projects

Shafiei, I; Eshtehardian, E; Nasirzadeh, F and Arabi, S (2023) Dynamic modeling to reduce the cost of quality in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(1), pp. 24-37. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

In the construction industry, the primary concern of project-based organizations is how to achieve a balance between the optimal level of quality and the associated costs. The cost of quality (COQ) can help to achieve this balance. COQ in construction projects are dynamic in nature and hence should be considered as a complex interrelated system rather than a set of separate individual factors. This research aims to model the complex system of cost of quality and present policies for the reduction of those costs in construction projects. To implement the proposed model, the system dynamics approach is used to determine the impact of prevention and failure costs on the COQ and to analyze designed policies. The qualitative model is created through the causal loop diagrams (CLD) and is analyzed quantitatively using the system dynamics approach for a case project. According to the research results, an increase in training hours and employing experienced labors will decrease the failure cost and will increase the prevention costs, resulting in a reduction in cost of quality. However, based on the simulation results, the use of labor with a higher work experience will provide the largest decrease in the cost of quality.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost of quality; failure cost; prevention cost; simulation; system dynamics
Index terms: prevention, construction industry, complex system, construction project, system dynamics, dynamic modelling, project-based organization
Subjects: organization, computing systems, modelling and simulation, production management, financial risk, industry analysis, systems engineering
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here