Social media for disaster management: The Sri Lankan context

Shandraseharan, A and Kulatunga, U (2023) Social media for disaster management: The Sri Lankan context. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(4), pp. 648-655. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Impacts of disasters were expeditious in the last decade due to the insufficiency of existing traditional Disaster Management (DM) practices. Though the social media discovered as a vital tool to enhance DM all over the world, dearth of literature found for the context of Sri Lanka. Therefore, this research focuses on identifying the use of social media for the DM in the context of Sri Lanka and to increase the support given to the possible victims, related to DM through the adoption of social media. A comprehensive literature review has been carried out to investigate the concept of social media and its relationship with DM. Case study research strategy has been used for the data collection on identifying the benefits and limitations on usage of social media for DM in the Sri Lankan context. Collected data analysed using content analysis. Findings of the study revealed, early warning as the most common benefit of using social media for DM in the Sri Lankan context. It was also identified from this study that, there are limitations related to quality of information, public commitment towards social media and financial barriers, which hinder the application of social media in Sri Lanka.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: disaster management; disasters; social media; Sri Lanka
Index terms: case study, disaster management, Sri Lanka, social media, early warning, commitment, literature review, strategy, content analysis
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, technology adoption, psychology, data collection methods, financial risk, Geography, management
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here