Streamlined life cycle assessment: A method for considering environmental impact of road construction

Treloar, G J; Love, P E D and Smith, J (1999) Streamlined life cycle assessment: A method for considering environmental impact of road construction. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

The main advantage of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is in supporting decision-making with scientific data. Fully developed LCAs, however, are time-consuming and costly to prepare, limiting their viability during the procurement process. Streamlined LCAs, on the other hand, can be used more effectively as decision-making tools, due to the reduced level of data required. The inclusion of input-output data improves the completeness of streamlined LCAs, which are often severely abbreviated. This paper demonstrates the integration of input-output data with case traditional LCA data for a road system. It is shown that the use of input-output analysis greatly increases the completeness of the analysis, while the inclusion of traditional LCA data greatly improves reliability. Results for a road system are compared to typical buildings.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; input-output analysis; life cycle cost; road
Index terms: procurement process, life cycle assessment, life cycle cost, decision-making, integration, environmental impact, road construction, input-output analysis
Subjects: environmental impact, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, civil engineering, research methods, organizational analysis, decision analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here