Integrating building information modeling with value engineering to facilitate the selection of building design alternatives considering sustainability

Taher, A H and Elbeltagi, E E (2023) Integrating building information modeling with value engineering to facilitate the selection of building design alternatives considering sustainability. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(11), pp. 1886-1901. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The recent accelerated development of the information management process has assisted to provide further technical development in the construction industry. In order to achieve the best sustainable design, it is critical to examine the design of construction projects and consider all potential alternatives. This problem may become very difficult when the choice of alternative depends on the assessment of a number of design related criteria. Hence, there is a need for better tools and increased use of technology to improve the selection of suitable alternative. The use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and value engineering can improve sustainable design even further. In addition, the use of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a fundamental approach to decision making. This paper presents a framework integrating BIM with VE to improve sustainable design by creating a model designed to select the best alternative with several criteria. This model is based on the development of a 5D BIM model, studying the energy efficiency of building design. Also, assess the relative environmental impacts of building materials. Finally, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is considered through the LEED rating system according to ISO 14040 standards. The results show that the proposed model has the potential to improve the study of VE job plan, and the importance of the model in evaluating and selecting the most appropriate alternative design.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; criteria; life cycle assessment; decision-making; sustainable design; value engineering
Index terms: building material, construction industry, analytical hierarchy process, energy efficiency, building information modelling, building design, decision-making, construction project, environmental impact, ISO, sustainable design, value engineering, life cycle assessment
Subjects: architectural design, sustainability and energy, standards development, building materials, environmental impact, value management, industry analysis, decision-making and optimization, information systems, decision analysis, production management, design process
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here