Green public procurement model for environmental assessment of constructive systems

Timm, J F G; Maciel, V G and Passuello, A (2023) Green public procurement model for environmental assessment of constructive systems. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(4), pp. 718-728. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Green public procurement (GPP) has the potential to induce sustainable development and reduce the impact of the construction sector. However, there are obstacles to its effective implementation, mainly in developing countries. Herein, we proposed a GPP model and framework based on constructive systems' environmental performance. We argue that the present proposal minimizes the gaps involving GPP and supports its implementation in the construction sector. The development of the GPP model and framework is based on an intensive theoretical overview, interview with stakeholders, and validation phase. Also, an integrated holistic framework for GPP adoption based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is performed. Besides that, the GPP model is based on an integrated and collaborative system that involves all the stakeholders. This research contributes to the scarce GPP literature in the context of sustainability in developing countries and softens the lack of metrics to evaluate the environmental impacts of materials and buildings. The model has the potential to support the decision-making process in buildings' early-stage design and integrates data and stakeholders promoting environmental awareness and can leverage the practice of GPP with appropriate comparisons. It opens a new perspective on the GPP providing knowledge and supporting decision-market.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental framework; environmental product declaration; life cycle assessment; sustainable buildings
Index terms: implementation, environmental awareness, decision-making process, environmental performance, environmental assessment, construction sector, validation, environmental impact, sustainable building, life cycle assessment, sustainable development, interview, developing country, proposal
Subjects: environmental behaviour, project planning, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, environmental impact, decision analysis, industry analysis, sustainability assessment, sustainable construction, development economics, professional development, health safety and environment
Topics: Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here