Waterhouse, M and McCabe, S (1999) A critical examination of the concept of 'best practice'. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, 15-17 September 1999, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
In contemporary business many words have entered the lexicon of everyday use. The expression 'world class' is used to describe those organizations that are believed to be exemplars of how to achieve superior levels of customer service. As those who advocate becoming world class organizations suggest, the challenge for those who wish to improve their ability to provide customer service is to learn what such organizations do in order to achieve this status, and, therefore, to consider how they may implement 'best practice'. A recommended method of learning best practice, we are informed, is to use a management technique called benchmarking. This paper considers what this technique involves, and, more particularly, what is meant by 'best practice'. By drawing upon data elicited during a research project carried out in partnership with, amongst others, West Midlands Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and Birmingham TEC we explore how a number of surveying practices in the West Midlands have attempted to implement benchmarking in order to achieve best practice. As we, like the surveying firms, have discovered, 'best practice' is an extremely vague and nebulous concept. Thus, we contend, if organizations in the construction industry are to engage in the sort of long-term improvement suggested in the Egan Report, there is an urgent need to appreciate these difficulties. As we conclude, we in academia must be prepared to assist practitioners by facilitating understanding of what benchmarking to achieve best practice really involves.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmarking; best practice; customers; improvement |
| Index terms: | practitioner, academia, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, best practice, benchmarking, construction industry, surveying, Birmingham, becoming, customer service, drawing, partnership |
| Subjects: | business, practitioner, professional institution, technical documentation, health monitoring assessment and metrics, performance measurement, service delivery, Geography, educational institutions, partnership management, industry analysis, philosophical process |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Education, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here