Zhang, L; Hu, H; Fang, Y; Qiang, Z and Cai, Y (2023) Preliminary CSI specification localization methodology matrix in China. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(6), pp. 935-944. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The Construction Specification Institute (CSI) specifications are widely used to define client quality standards and facilitate communications among design and construction professionals in North America. When a US company builds a facility in China, these specifications are applied and expected to be implemented by client to ensure the project quality. Owing to differences in design and construction practices, market availabilities of products, and quality acceptance regulatory requirements, the CSI Specifications for North America must be modified to fit Chinese local regulations, market availability, and construction technology while direct translating the specification into English does not work. A CSI specification model is built based on the structure and section contents followed by the inputs of issues, research questions and category of section are developed. And 5 step analysis is provided as the solutions of localized specifications suitable for Chinese market and construction execution. Furthermore, the model is validated at a real project, followed by a discussion of evaluation and limitations. Using the code system and section content of standard CSI specification, and considering equivalent Chinese code, local market availability and quality acceptance requirements are the primary methods to localize these specifications. This approach enables defining quality expectations representing corporate brand names in a language relevant to local market stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction code; facility standards; quality; specification localization |
| Index terms: | design and construction, construction technology, localization, client quality, regulation, methodology, China, brand name, specification |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, urban planning, digital engineering, business, client relations, political science, Geography, contractual condition, research methods |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Procurement, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here